The Threat of War
The USA election should not be decided upon by dint of whether the population of the country can or can not be fooled into fearing consequences that do not exist.
While we are on the subject is it also wrong to reassure the population of a lack of danger when there clearly is one. Or is the danger being created by the acts of the agressor, in this case the USA led by GW Bush?
War has evolved with every conflict and some even think that it is required to stimulate progress. Does this mean that war has given more to science than it has taken away from humanity?
Is the real question which candidate can think ahead of ”the enemy” the USA has spent 3 trillion dollars fighting accelerate the US economy so another 3 trillion is not all that much?
Wonder which candidate will actually enable the USA to step out of the economic qugmire the legacy of GW Bush. If the impeach, there may be a rationale that Halliburton belongs to the government rather than the other way around?